October 1932 RadioCraft
[Table
of Contents]
Wax nostalgic about and learn from the history of early electronics.
See articles from RadioCraft,
published 1929  1953. All copyrights are hereby acknowledged.

One very satisfying aspect of
'rolling your own' audio frequency coils (aka chokes, aka inductors), is how well
the simple inductance equations match measured end results. Unless you really manage
to mangle the job, if you use the right equation and are reasonably careful to observe
wire size, spacing (including insulation), and core diameter, you will be amazed
at how close practice matches theory. Although strictly speaking audio frequencies
run from a few Hertz up to maybe 15 kHz for people with really good hearing.
My experience is that similar success can be had even into the low MHz realm with
just a little tuning required. It's not until you get into the realm of selfresonance
that everything starts falling apart with basic equations.
Building Your Own A.F. Choke Coils
By C. H. W. Nason
Fig. 1  Magnetization flux and hysteresis curves.
Fig. 2  Inductor core lamination.
Fig. 3  Coil turns vs. air gap inductance chart.

For a given inductance and D.C. through the core, the number and size wire may
easily be determined by means of the chart above. For an inductance of 20 henries,
with 120 ma. through the core, 6,700 turns of No. 35 wire should be used on the
core indicated in Fig. 2.
Filter chokes designed for a given inductance require calculations far outside
the abilities of the average amateur. Before discussing actual simplified design
methods it might be well, however, to discuss briefly the factors involved. Certain
relations are involved in the design of the magnetic circuit which are briefly as
follows:
Factor 
Equation 
Unit of Expression 
H (the magnetic force 
4 pi N I 
Gilberts per Cm. 
Φ (the flux) 
u H A 
Maxwells 
B (the flux density) 
Φ/A 
Gausses 
u (the permeability) 
B/H 
Numeric value 
In these equations:
1 = the magnetic path in cms.
A = the cross section of the core in sq. cms.
N =the number of turns.
I = the current in amperes.
pi = 3.1416
If we pass a gradually increasing current through the winding surrounding a magnetic
material the relation of B to H is as shown in Fig. 1A. If the current through
the winding is now decreased it will not follow the original path of the curve but
will take another course as shown in Fig. 1B. Thus for a given value of H a
twofold value of B corresponding to Q and to R in Fig. 1B are found. (This
is due to the residual magnetism in the core and the condition is known as "hysteresis."
Naturally, the smaller this loop the better is the core material for magnetic purposes.)
If with a fixed D.C. magnetizing force a small A.C. voltage is superimposed,
a minor hysteresis loop appears as is indicated in Fig. 1C. It is from the
minor loop that we determine the permeability of the core material to alternating
currents, and it is u_{a.c.} that we employ in calculating the inductance
of a transformer or choke. The factor u_{a.c.} is defined as being equal
to ΔB ΔH or the increment in B divided by the corresponding increment
in H for a given A.C. flux. It may be readily seen that the value for u_{a.c.}
is something quite different from the arithmetical value for u obtained from the
original B/H curve. This value is not really a constant as it varies over a range
of A.C. flux densities. The relation of u_{a.c.} to the A.C. flux is shown
in Fig. 1D for two values of D.C. magnetizing force. These values are for
a particular core material and are consequently not for design purposes.
With u_{a.c.} determined for a given D.C. flux density the inductance
of the winding may he calculated from the equation.
It will be noted in Fig. 1D that the value u_{a.c.} increases slightly
for the higher values of A.C. flux density but the increase has the effect of slightly
adding to the inductance of the winding and is therefore beneficial in its effect
except where sharply tuned circuits are involved.
It an airgap be provided in a magnetic core the D.C. flux density will fall
off but an increase in the A.C. permeability will obtain. There is an optimum value
for this relation which depends upon the characteristics of the particular iron
chosen for the core material. That is to say: for some length of airgap  for some
substitution of a material having unit permeability for a portion of the magnetic
path  the A.C. permeability will be at a maximum. Not only this, but the D.C. flux
density may be varied over a wide range with but slight effect upon the inductance
of the winding.
In most A.F. transformers a certain percentage of airgap is necessary (although
it is provided in the case of the highest quality transformers only). The airgap
may be dispensed with only when the D.C. flux density is at zero through the use
of parallel feed systems. In pushpull transformers the D.C. components are assumed
to cancel but there are high values of A.C. in the core and a certain amount of
D.C. is always present due to tube irregularities so that an airgap is still essential
to an economical design.
In order to offer a series of chokes for the average experimenter to construct
with a full knowledge of the characteristics that will obtain it is first necessary
that a particular lamination be chosen which will be available to him. A core form
which will offer a range in the neighborhood of 30 henries for all normal values
of D.C. flux and which will at the same time lend itself to an economical design
in so far as D.C. resistance is concerned may be achieved around the EI11 lamination
of the Lamination Stamping Company (located at Brackenridge, Pa.)
Fig. 4  Coil turns vs. wire resistance inductance graph.

The dimensions of this core are as shown in Fig. 2. The characteristics of
a core having a square crosssection are as follows:
Window area, 0.575sq.in.;
Volume, 4.03 cu. in.;
Core weight, 1.13 lbs.;
Area, 4.94 sq. cm. or .766sq. in.;
Length of path, 15.61 cm. or 6.13 in.
Winding data from the charts is based on the use of enamel wire of the size indicated
and with glassine paper between layers. The ends of windings should be straightened
with pieces of fiber and the core itself should be protected with several layers
of brown paper.
In forming the windings a piece of wood should be cut to slightly less than the
core dimensions and wrapped with one layer of string. After winding. this string
may be pulled out and the coil removed from the wood form. The values for the airgap
given in the chart refer to the total gap and in the case of EI laminations the
gap at the center and in each leg should be just half the value read from the chart.
Any machinist will lend you a micrometer to assist in building up wafers of paper
or of fiber to insert in the legs. The holes provided in the core offer ready means
for mounting and for clamping in position by means of iron or brass straps in methods
which will readily suggest themselves to the experimenter.
Variations from the data in the charts may be achieved by varying the "stack"
of the laminations. For double the stack (2 x 0.875in.) the inductance will be
doubled for a given current density and number of turns; while the resistance of
the windings will be increased by but onethird. For onehalf the stack specified,
the inductance will be halved; and the resistance will be reduced by about 16 percent.
We may thus achieve with this single type of lamination any value of inductance
up to 60 henries with D.C.; or up to over 200 henries where no D.C. is employed.
The core material employed in calculating the charts was Allegheny Super Dynamo
Grade Steel Sheets and the calculations are based on the assumption that 1 volt
of A.C. is superimposed on the D.C.; for high A.C. flux densities a slightly higher
inductance will prevail.
As an example, let us suppose that we desire a choke having an inductance of
20 henries at a current of 120 ma. on the core specified . Tracing through from
the 20 henry line at the left edge of the curve we find that this cuts the 120 ma.
line at 6,700 turns. We find from the wire sizeresistance curve, that the wire
size for this number of turns is No. 35 enamel; and that the resistance of the choke
will be 1,100 ohms. Under these conditions the second chart shows that the airgap
is about 0.045in. This means that 0.0225in. of insulating material will be required
in each leg of the choke core.
Now, an efficient choke should not have a resistance so high as this unless designed
for a specific purpose  for instance, let us suppose that a receiver employing
a 2,500ohm dynamic field in its filter system must be used with an external speaker
and we desire to replace the original speaker field with a choke. In this case we
would work backwards from the specifications that our choke must have a 2,500ohm
resistance. On the basis of economy, let us see what we can do with our choke design
in order to reduce the resistance.
As we noted before. increasing the height of the core stack by 100% increases
the inductance of any form of winding by a like degree. On the basis of a square
stack we start with an inductance of 10 henries at 120 ma. This calls for 5,000
turns of No. 33 wire, a total resistance of 450 ohms. Increasing the stack by 100%
likewise increased the resistance by onethird. Our total resistance is therefore
600 ohms. Reference to the second chart indicates a total airgap of 0.035 in. or
.0175in. in each leg.
Posted August 13, 2020 (updated from original post on 12/26/2014)
